|
|
|
|
|
by haldujai
1454 days ago
|
|
Yes exactly, perhaps I was unclear. In my description, it is conceivable that due to chronicity the field was contaminated at the time of second OR and/or a lysis of adhesions resulted in a contaminated field. If the surgeon implanted mesh in a contaminated field this would be seeded and inevitably get infected. This is not uncommon and why surgeons often don’t implant mesh in complex LOA or possibly dirty fields. I’m not saying this is what happened, but delayed diagnosis of a complicated hernia can increase the risk of complications from repair. |
|
The surgeon who performed the mesh repair did clearly state it was a possibility, but the hernia wasn't suitable for non-mesh repair, which would have been his preference.
There was no indication of infection or contamination at the time of the hernia repair, and the surgeon who performed the mesh believes the infection was most likely caused by poor aftercare, which was handled by the local hospital due to covid travel difficulties. Of course, he could just be saying that to cover his ass.