[Atsuii]

Apron buses are very common in large airports and I always found it really efficient. From memory I’ve used them at Haneda, Narita and KL. Perhaps the ones in Germany are just altered metro buses though, which would be terrible. Apron buses are efficient due to being low to the ground, having very wide doors to accomodate quick loading and unloading, typically no seats.

[Aeolun]

They may be efficient for the airport, but they suck balls for the passengers.

The last thing I want to do after a long and tiring flight is load up into a bunch of packed buses.

[yongjik]

They may be efficient given the layout of the airport (which can't be changed), but if you are to design a new airport, you cannot beat the efficiency of jetways. Hundreds of people just walking down the hallway.

[nradov]

Buses are a lot less efficient than proper jetways. Why are European airports so far behind?

[jltsiren]

European low-cost airlines are terrible. They do everything they can to lower the fees they pay. That often involves skipping major airports, unless they can negotiate a cheap enough deal with the airport. Those deals tend to involve things that make the passenger experience worse, because the airports don't want normal airlines to choose the same deal.

If you choose a normal airline and fly to any reasonably big airport that's not overcrowded, you'll get a jetway outside exceptional situations.

[nradov]

I've flown on major airlines through German hub airports and was stuck riding a bus to the airplane.

[bobthepanda]

A decent new airport or significant airport reconstruction costs probably $5B+ (DEN cost $4.8B in the 90s; Beijing Daxing cost $11.5B) In austerity-minded Europe there really isn’t money for this. Even if there was, NIMBYs and green campaigners mean there is very little appetite to pursue it politically.

[gpvos]

Oh, we have them, but they charge extra for it. Capitalism, you know.