|
|
|
|
|
by johnfn
1456 days ago
|
|
> I specifically linked to the_duke's comment offering some good-faith feedback. My point with this thread is it follows a common pattern. A HN user will post something in bad faith. The maintainer will respond with annoyance. Then someone like the_duke will moralize about how the maintainer shouldn't be so antagonistic. Then GP will put it in a list and say "the lead dev and community do not engage criticism in good faith." What is going on here? |
|
When it happens, it feels like living in Groundhog Day.
See any Brave post. There's a comment about BAT stealing money, people debunking it and the same arguments over 10 comments. Just below that someone mentions Eich's history at Mozilla, same pattern.
See any Urbit post.
See any V post.
See any foone post.
In these threads you find always the same archetypes of comments and posturing it makes me wonder if we're really living in a simulation of not very good AI. Or that a group of people is collectively pretty dumb and more predictable than you'd think.