[ryanmarsh]

Yes, you understood the assignment. The public knows about US and NATO weapons what the US and NATO wants the public to know. Individuals in a position to know the truth, who violate the narrative, are dealt with harshly.

Case in point: The public had relatively little knowledge of the battlefield performance of current gen ATGM's prior to Russia's recent offensive in Ukraine. This is in spite of the fact "current gen" dates back to the 2003 US invasion of Iraq where they played a decisive role. Today, according to the press, ATGMs are the savior of Ukraine.

[greedo]

This is ridiculous. Anyone could have looked at the test results for Javelin and seen that it would be successful against modern armor. Same with the Ukrainian Skif and Stugna ATGMs, the UK's Brimstone and the NLAW. All of these had been extensively tested by multiple parties and found highly effective.

And the threat posed by ATGMs to improperly deployed tanks has been well understood since the 73 War where Israel first faced the Sagger ATGM.

Also, ATGMs didn't play a big role in either Iraq or Afghanistan, especially against armored vehicles. In Afghanistan the Javelin was used primarily as a bunker buster or knocking on cave doors. In Iraq, both TOW and Javelin were used for breaking up fortifications. Hellfire was used in the abortive Apache raid that showed how useless helicopter gunships were in a contested environment with lots of AAA.

This idea that there's a secret arsenal with staff and personal briefed on a need to know basis is just conspiracy theory. Sure, there are weapons in development that are secret, and specific capabilities are secret, but there's very few silver bullets hiding out in Tonopah or White Sands.

[ryanmarsh]

Anyone could have looked at the test results for Javelin and seen that it would be successful against modern armor.

Agreed, but most didn't. I believe it was downplayed.

ATGMs didn't play a big role in either Iraq or Afghanistan

I said they played a "decisive" role. I should have said a "key" role. The battle of Debecka Pass is one such example.

[greedo]

I guess I would differ in describing it that way as well. Anything north of Baghdad on Day 18 was not a key battle at all, despite the Javelin playing a somewhat exaggerated role. Reading the wiki entry, it sounds like the ODAs were almost overrun despite the Javelin, and were saved by F-18s flying CAS.

[ryanmarsh]

Anything north of Baghdad on Day 18 was not a key battle at all

Agreed. Key in the battle, not a key battle.

saved by F-18s flying CAS

That's not how the team explained it.

[HelloNurse]

The scary hypersonic missiles are the large, suborbital ones that can be used for bombardment; anti-tank rockets are a different genre of weapon, with unrelated uses, projects and funding.