17% of stocks != 17% of voting rights. I don't know the current numbers, but Zuck was known for aggressive use of priority shares to retain voting control of the company as he was selling shares.
> larceny from the person or presence of another by violence or threat
How does Facebookâs share offering meet the definition of robbery?
That Zuckerberg was selling a product with such high demand and so little supply that he was able to sell at a very high price does not qualify as Zuckerberg robbing others. It is not even bread for a starving person, it is equity to chase returns.
Stock classes are the biggest robbery of modern times.