[adamauckland]

I don't know if you're being deliberately obtuse or argumentative.

It's not about transitioning between skillsets now, it's about future proofing.

I went from doing corporate enterprise applications on Windows NT to embedded systems when the PocketPC came out. Mobile computers didn't exist when I interviewed but because I was a generalist they had confidence that I could pick up the manuals and figure it out.

Note - I didn't work for FAANG because F and N didn't exist and A was a bookstore and G was a search engine :)

[lapcat]

> I don't know if you're being deliberately obtuse or argumentative.

I refer you to the guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

> because I was a generalist they had confidence that I could pick up the manuals and figure it out

Why you though? That's the point I'm making. Of course a smaller company with limited resources may have to repurpose existing employees. But when a BigCo with a massive budget needs to do something new, they can assign existing employees with the closest expertise, hire new employees with relevant expertise, or acquire other companies. It's unclear why a generalist with no domain expertise would be preferable.

[adamauckland]

Companies do new stuff all the time which has no domain expertise, the experts are already employed in other places, hiring takes months, they might just be doing a spike to see if it's worth investing in.

When GDPR came out, some companies employed experts to deal with it but I expect most companies just gave the job to some unlucky employee.