[MontyCarloHall]

The Tesla bull will say that Tesla’s ML has gotten so good that these top-shelf human curators are now unnecessary, and can be outsourced or dispensed with entirely. The Tesla bear will counter that this is merely to keep up appearances; it looks a hell of a lot better to fire data curators over machine learning engineers, even if the former are still just as (if not more!) necessary as the latter.

[andsoitis]

> The Tesla bear will counter that this is merely to keep up appearances

I would be very surprised if Tesla optimized for optics here.

[MattRix]

They still have a lot of human curators (Elon said they have over 1500 in a recent interview). I imagine that these cuts are for some category of labeling that has become redundant.

[DoesntMatter22]

This is really the most realistic answer. As they get closer and closer to FSD (and it is quite close now), they will need fewer and fewer people.

[user_named]

How do you know its close?

[MattRix]

You can watch user videos of it in action on YouTube. It improves with (nearly) every patch and often requires minimal or no user interventions. It still sometimes makes very bad mistakes though so I don’t think it’s as close as the previous poster does. But I think in the next year or two it could be good enough for many cities during clear weather.

[misiti3780]

As someone using FSD Beta, I concur that it is getting significantly better with every new over the air update.

[ddmma]

Not to mention the release of Tesla bots due to September event.