| >211 counts of violating Pennsylvania's 24-hour informed consent law Sounds to me like he patients were not aware of what he was doing And he was doing a hell of a lot more than just abortions >The DEA, The FBI, and the Office of the Inspector General also sought a 23-count indictment charging Gosnell and seven members of his former staff with drug conspiracy relating to the practice's illegally prescribing highly-addictive painkillers and sedatives outside the usual course of professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose. So again, you pick out one guy who should not have been a physician who did not inform his patient of what he was doing And this detail is pretty important, these were not abortions but murders after birth >They arise because of the "born alive rule", a principle of common law which stipulates that by default, for legal purposes, personhood arises – and therefore unlawful killing constituting murder becomes possible – immediately upon the victim's being born alive Pointing this guy out is like pointing out that old veteran who's like 110 years old and smokes and drinks every day and claiming nobody gets cancer from smoking and drinking You are aware that murder, killing people who are already born, is already illegal? These examples were not abortions, plain and simple |
Only the "41 week old abortions" were treated as murder, the 39 week old ones weren't. My question is - what's the difference? In your mind, how do you justify a 39 week old elective abortion?