[somenameforme]

When the evidence for some "thing", from an entity that would know better, is clearly not really testing or demonstrating that thing, it tends to itself be evidence that what has been achieved is not what is being claimed. And this is starting to become par for the course in many fields, but especially in this one.

It's like claiming you've invented a car that can somehow go 400mph. And as evidence you show yourself not only just driving at 80mph on the Autobahn, but also using action-cut style cinematography to make it look more impressive to those who aren't in the know enough to look down at the speedometer. I can't prove you haven't done what you're claiming, but you're making a pretty strong case against yourself.

Oh, also in the latest news [1] it turns out that the "leaked" transcript of Lambda was "edited with readability and narrative coherence in mind" including editing the material and even changing the order of various dialogues.

[1] - https://www.businessinsider.com/transcript-of-sentient-googl...