|
|
|
|
|
by dmix
1459 days ago
|
|
The critique is that the type of ethics they concern themselves with is borderline moral-panic/Victorian era. Not the Laws of Robotics kind of stuff. Maybe it's my personality but I get the impression since AI is rather limited in 2022 that all the paid AI ethicists spending 90% of the time on bullshit problems because there aren't many real threats. And these gets amplified because the news is always looking for a FUD angle with every AI story. The priority seems to be protecting random peoples feelings from hypothetical scenarios they invent, when IRL they are releasing research tools on a long-term R&D timeline... GPT-3 isn't a consumer product they are releasing. It's a baby step on a long road to something way bigger. Crippling that progress because of some hyper-sensitivty to people who get offended easily seems ridiculous to me. |
|
I think we’re about due for an AI-ethics winter.