[mmarq]

People line up for 15-20£ lunches because they have to, because they have been forced to go back to the office to make their daily sacrifice to Micronus, the petty god of middle management, and to Parasitus, the evil god of real estate.

They may live more frugal lives, and feed themselves with close to expiration Tesco sandwiches that cost 0.01£ (why, it’s left as an exercise), but it won’t help them getting out of poverty and renting (which in itself is a form of poverty in a country where tenants can and are routinely evicted for asking repairs).

So it’s not impossible to live a more frugal life and save 5£ a day, which is less than 2000£ a year, it’s pointless if the price of the average house increases by 7-8% a year. What is one doing this for? To please the editor of the Daily Telegraph who complains about millennials?

The only way out for the individual is to earn more or to enjoy a lottery-like event, such as my company going public. The collective way out will probably require political action, of what kind I don’t know nor I care. But we can’t pretend that the better educated generation in the entire history of mankind can’t buy houses because they can’t budget and spend too much on avocados and takeaways.

[zpeti]

>People line up for 15-20£ lunches because they have to, because they have been forced to go back to the office to make their daily sacrifice to Micronus, the petty god of middle management, and to Parasitus, the evil god of real estate.

How is going back to the office forcing you to buy £15 lunches? You don't have to even eat Tesco sandwiches. Believe it or not my parents made their own sandwiches at home, which probably has a cost of around £1 for a lunch. So you can save £10-14 on lunch. And they might actually be tastier, but again, needs personal input and work.

And your math is completely off again. £2000 per year is £20,000 in 10 years, plus interest you might have £25-30k. And you can save way more than £5 a day, easily if you actually - ACTUALLY - pay attention and have personal control.

That's getting close to a deposit on a house.

[mmarq]

> How is going back to the office forcing you to buy £15 lunches? You don't have to even eat Tesco sandwiches. Believe it or not my parents made their own sandwiches at home, which probably has a cost of around £1 for a lunch. So you can save £10-14 on lunch. And they might actually be tastier, but again, needs personal input and work.

You can go as far as only paying for a train ticket to get to work and rent the smallest flat in zone 4. Even assuming that you manage to survive on 40£ per day including rent (that in London buys you the lifestyle on a European agricultural worker in 1800), and that you earn an average income (35K£), you won’t save more than 1000£ per month. Which is 12K£ per year, which barely matches the average price increase of properties in London. If you earn 90K£ per annum, with this miserable lifestyle you can save 3800£ per month, which is 45K a year. So living the most miserable lifestyle possible, somebody in the 90th percentile of the income distribution, can put down a deposit to buy a 2-bed flat after 3-4 years, assuming prices stop spiralling out of control.

Considering that a millennial should live like a miserable for decades to buy a 2-bed flat that their parents could buy with a few years of savings while having normal lives, I find it extremely out of touch to claim that an entire generation (the better educated in the history of mankind, I repeat) can’t buy homes because they can’t manage their budgets.

> And your math is completely off again. £2000 per year is £20,000 in 10 years, plus interest you might have £25-30k

Which is 1/6 of the deposit you need to buy a 2-bed flat in London. So it’s 60 years for the deposit and then a 40 year mortgage. Assuming, again, that prices don’t keep doubling every 10 years.