|
|
|
|
|
|
by anonymoushn
1458 days ago
|
|
|
If the project has cultural issues that would cause severe correctness issues regardless of the language's semantics, it may not be that useful to talk about technical solutions that would let other projects without these cultural issues make a language with similar semantics and fewer correctness issues. > Since you apparently know these people, how about collecting their opinions and presenting them anonymised This sounds like the sort of claim that would get called out as unfalsifiable online. > Likewise, if there are lies spread across so many posts, why not simply collect and refute them? This all seems obvious to me, but maybe I am missing something? Is the question really "Why don't you just do a lot of work for me, for free, since I will not use a search engine?" |
|
|
How can solving – or failing to solve – a technical issue that could then lead to insights shared between communities ever be a bad thing? Maybe I am just too thick to see it? But I am ending my efforts at this point as I am not getting any closer to understanding what you are trying to convey.
As for your “comebacks”, we clearly have very different standards and expectations when it comes to discourse. Where I come from, those that bring claims are expected to also bring adequate evidence – or at the very least attempt to do so and not spread claims just to later throw their hands into the air when called out for it.