|
|
|
|
|
by tharne
1458 days ago
|
|
> Suburban single-family homes are specifically an elitist policy. Prior to the widespread development of suburban single family homes post WWII, most Americans outside of those in rural areas could not afford to home their own home. Suburbs are the exact opposite of an elitist policy, and in fact the overwhelming majority of Americans, including a majority of immigrants, live in the suburbs. |
|
[1] Note that home prices wobbled a bit but were relatively even from the recovery after WWI and the flu through the early 60s. Income over that time increased significantly (https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/16-05intax.pdf). Things change rapidly after that. I think it suggests a more complicated situation than "it all changed post WWII."
https://voxeu.org/article/home-prices-1870
[2] About half of the country. Nothing like today.
https://getrawmilk.com/content/urbanization-usa-rural-vs-urb...
[3] Affordable because of VA and FHA loans after the war. And increasing wages. And flat housing prices.
[4] Actually, the FHA (#3) mainstreamed redlining. That's pretty darned elitist.
https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/mapmaker-r...
[5] We're mostly suburban in the same way we're all middle class, smart, and attractive: self-description, but not any objective measure.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-11-14/u-s-is-ma...