|
|
|
|
|
by thrown_22
1452 days ago
|
|
>Extrapolating from that to interracial marriage, which rests on a different and vastly firmer legal ground, is a dirty smear tactic against a man who is himself in an interracial marriage. You're calling him so morally bankrupt that he would only vote impartially on laws that don't impact him personally, while he would vote with his self interest in all other cases. |
|
That suggests that Thomas would vote to overturn Loving, not that he would avoid it out of his own self interest.