Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by anonymoushn 1459 days ago
"Yuri's criticism was not that Julia has correctness bugs as a language" would be an appropriate thing to say if none of the bugs in the post were "Wrong if-else control flow."

Edit: "certain libraries when composed with common operations had bugs" also does not seem like a completely on-the-level way to describe bugs in the stdlib that do not require any particular composition to encounter.
1 comments
ViralBShah 1459 days ago
If you look at the linked issue, you will see that it is a type intersection issue (a real language issue) mischaracterized as a control-flow bug. Many readers here seem to see that and believe that if statements in Julia are broken - no that is not the case.
link
anonymoushn 1459 days ago
As an end user it may be hard for me to accept that there are no control-flow bugs involved when this code

    println(flag)
    if flag
        println("flow for true.")
    else
        println("flow for false.")
    end
prints

  false
  flow for true.
link
oivey 1459 days ago
I pasted that code into a REPL (including setting flag=false, which seems to be implied) and got:

  false
  flow for false.
How did you get your output? Your post implies that if statements are broken in Julia. Untrue.
link
jakobnissen 1458 days ago
It is from the top comment in https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/41096
link