|
|
|
|
|
|
by londons_explore
1456 days ago
|
|
|
I think the distinction is that if the parties involved don't have a contract between them, copyright law applies. But if there is a contract in place, then copyright law no longer applies, and you instead have to resolve any disputes as if they were violations of a contract. The difficulty being that the GPL allows anyone to enter into a contract without even consent of the other party, and the contract law courts may not see that as a valid contract. |
|
|
No, it doesn't. Voluntarily, publicly offering the GPL as license terms is consenting to others accepting that offer.