|
|
|
|
|
|
by IceMetalPunk
1457 days ago
|
|
|
"As a subordinate clause; what follows is independent of it." Um... so your argument is that "when the writers of the Constitution explicitly wrote their reasoning for this clause, they didn't actually care if that reason mattered, they just felt like writing more words; and we can ignore half the sentence"? Followed shortly thereafter by lambasting people ignoring the Constitution? ...please tell me you see the irony here... |
|
|
And now you're arguing in bad faith, I explicitly stated why the subordinate clause was part of the amendment and pointed you to a hard core reference for that. Not going to make any more replies to you.