> All I can think is that this must be the cheaper route for businesses, or they wouldn't do it that way
It might be for some businesses in some jurisdictions but that's not true at global scale. There's just not enough margin in retail to cover losses that way.
(Full disclosure: I'm currently working with a client on a loss prevention project, big retail stores are the customers)
It might be for some businesses in some jurisdictions but that's not true at global scale. There's just not enough margin in retail to cover losses that way.
(Full disclosure: I'm currently working with a client on a loss prevention project, big retail stores are the customers)