[ephbit]

My point here is: concerns with undesirable wealth distribution (in a hard money system) make IMO no sound argument against hard money. Because there's ways to redistribute wealth through the state.

Besides that, if the current wealth distribution (under non hard money) isn't all but a calamity, then what is it?

Also most states are currently doing effective redistribution of wealth so it's clearly something that can be done. One issue though in most states is that the redistribution is getting outpaced by countering effects, so it's insufficient.