[pfdietz]

The waste produced by a renewable energy system will be small (and of the same kind) compared to the waste produced by industrial society as a whole. If the renewable energy system isn't sustainable because of waste, then neither will be that industrial society, even if it were nuclear powered.

To be fair, waste isn't really the issue with nuclear power either.

[77pt77]

> waste isn't really the issue with nuclear power either.

So what is?

Because you're working overtime here against it without giving any reasons whatsoever.

[pfdietz]

> So what is?

Cost. It's the reason few nuclear plants are being built. No other reason is needed.

[nightski]

I'm not buying that all the solar panels, batteries, and grid infrastructure will produce little waste. Do you have any references to studies this or are you just going by gut feeling?

[pfdietz]

What specific waste is causing your trepidation? Solar and wind have most of their impact from mundane things like glass, aluminum, and steel. But enormous amounts of these are produced for the rest of the economy (annual world production of steel is nearly 2 gigatonnes). None of them present an insuperable obstacle to a global economy that could function indefinitely.

[raxxorraxor]

Last year we had the first ever permanent storage open. If it really opened, perhaps it was delayed again. Because storing nuclear waste long term is not a solved problem aside from the fact that uranium isn't endless either. Deconstructed nuclear plants also need to be cleaned up.