|
|
|
|
|
by qsort
1465 days ago
|
|
That's because there's no standard for rich text at all, everything is either MS Word, some other bespoke proprietary format, or a kludge on a kludge on a kludge. In part that's due to the shortcomings of HTML itself. And no, markdown a.k.a. whatever the interpreter accepts is decent enough at what it does but it's not what we are looking for here. |
|
For output (the value of the field), HTML is good enough already.
I don't see the problem.