|
|
|
|
|
by wlecometo
1465 days ago
|
|
the two "why" laptops before the frame.work laptop are ranked 97.6 which is rounded to 98 and then 9,8 as score; the frame.work is ranked 97.0 without rounding so it ends being 9,7 . the frame.work gets a higher score on the ease of disassembly and the tools you need to disassemble, but it gets a lower score on the documentation ( <flame> maybe documentation is not in french </flame> ) and on the price ratio for the component; probably frame.work parts are a bit more expensive in comparison with the price of the laptop. |
|
It is not the parts that seem to be expensive, it's that they are more expensive bought separately than bought inside a new laptop.
Also the availability duration for the parts. Maybe the uncertainty stemming from that Frame.work is a recently created startup?