[aristofun]

> Up-to-date science discoveries that absolutely excludes

You imply that there is such thing as absolute fact or absolute truth. Which is not the case unfortunately. Because what you call facts always go with interpretation and understanding.

Sometimes (usually on macro scale and in well known areas) it’s easy to come to agreement. But more often — it’s not.

Your post looks like an oversimplification and presents false dilemma (it’s not apples to apples, to put it simply).

[Lycanthropos]

>You imply that there is such thing as absolute fact or absolute truth. Which is not the case unfortunately

Is this not an absolute fact or an absolute truth? You're making an absolute universal claim even though you just rejected the notion of a absolute universal fact.

[aristofun]

I am not claiming that my point is absolute fact either.

And yes, real world is full of paradoxes like this.

It actually supports my point )