|
|
|
|
|
by NerdsCentral
5345 days ago
|
|
Totally agree. My original aim was to use an idea I had about the way the garbage collector synchronises in the Oracle JVM to give 'windows' of determinism. So I set about making a program to push the gc really hard so I could see if my idea worked. But I have not gotten as far as the original aim yet because I found this interesting stuff about the G1 collector. As for your points about realtime - I am completely with you. I had in my mind that one might have a realtime system on the rtjvm or in c++ which needed to periodically communicate with a standard JVM. There are three approaches I could see for this. One, would be to send messages and decouple that way. Another is to make the communication abort if it looked like it might cause a deadline miss. The third was to briefly (milliseconds) disable the gc in the standard JVM so the communication could occur and then turn it back on again immediately afterwards. Now - that sounds like a really bad idea and it probably is - but it is an interesting idea to play with. So - please don't thing I am proposing realtime programming on the standard JVM, just some ideas for larger systems integration. |
|
The solution, provided by the maker of the above-mentioned windows software is an external keying module. With this arrangement, windows sends characters to the hardware brick, which, latency-free, sends out the characters quite nicely. (Amazing how the trained morse-code ear can distinguish ms delays in character starts.)
Personally, I now think that way where a system has a component that is latency rich connected to a component that is latency-free. This of course has implications to the overall solution.