[jrochkind1]

> might be the same as the kettle thing: the US being on 120V,

I think you could be right about washing machines/dishwashers, but as far as electric kettles... even at US 120V, an electric kettle is WAY faster at heating water to boiling than even my fairly powerful (bigger than traditional burner) gas range. (Not to mention much more energy-efficient).

I have no idea why electric kettles aren't more popular in the US.

But I never thought about the 110V/230V thing with regard to kettles. I guess even though electric kettles in the US are faster than the stovetop, they still aren't as fast as everywhere else with 230V? Maybe "faster but not faster enough" is why people still heat water on a stovetop here? I don't know!

[roelschroeven]

Technology Connections recently had a video about the subject: "Why don't Americans use electric kettles?" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yMMTVVJI4c).

His main conclusion: Americans have less use for kettles since they don't drink tea (as much).

He also observes that electric kettles turn out to be faster and more efficient than other means of heating water for other purposes that are not obvious at first sight, as you also mention.

Not all European electric kettles are faster than American ones BTW. Mine is 1200 W (I think) which is in the range of what American ones can deliver. There are more powerful models available too of course.

[plorkyeran]

Heating water on a stovetop isn't actually particularly common. We don't have electric kettles because we have coffee makers instead.

[jrochkind1]

Most people that I know who make tea make it by heating water on the stovetop, and don't realize or don't care how much better an electric kettle could be; but of course you're right that coffee is much more popular than tea here, and perhaps that's why electric kettles aren't more well-known as superior for heating water.

I do not think it's because of 110V though! Even a 110V electric kettle is far faster than stovetop.