Yeah this was insufferable. I can only hope it was upvoted to talk about the subject and not for what the author actually said (the one time I'm glad for this bad habit of HN's).
Yep, to the extent the content was hard to discern. I am unclear what point the article is even trying to make.
The second paragraph was eye-watering:
> Say what you want about old people but they've merited the historical "Baby Boom" through sheer sexual prowess
The "Baby Boomers" were the product of the baby boom, not the instigators of it. The ones having the baby boom sex were their parents, the "Greatest Generation", who are now almost all dead.
> Now generations have to be named after backside alphabet letters cause everyone is focusing on their careers.
I assume this is a reference to "Generation Alpha". In what sense is Greek a "backside alphabet"? More confusingly, are they claiming a lack of sex has something to do with running out of Roman alphabet characters? I'm pretty sure no amount of procreation will make more letters.