|
|
|
|
|
|
by pyradius
1465 days ago
|
|
|
Tucker was no friend of George's but the anarchist worldview doesn't really hold up to any serious scrutiny. https://cooperative-individualism.org/andelson-robert_critic... "The anarchists' vagueness in attempting to define occupancy
and use was best exemplified in the correspondence between Tucker and Stephen Byington (who subsequently became a "disciple" of Tucker's). Byington wanted to know what would happen to occupiers of land or buildings when they would be away from their premises for a period of time. Tucker, reducing his answer to an absurdity, replied that the very last user and occupier would not only lose his land but his personal property as well." These are not serious worldviews. |
|
|
Relativity. You have spent years hearing views that are contrary to Tucker.
Of course they seem insincere and worth scoffing at. Making the entire premise unfalsifiable and hewing to hand me down gossip from the past, as if it has a monopoly on “greater good”.
Meat based tape recorders rambling inanity of the dead.
You should look into squatters rights. Tuckers view is alive and well in some forms in our society. It’s hardly resulted in physics inverting.
Vain people defending hand me down story regarding private property on the other hand tends to result in a whole lot of atrocity.