|
|
|
|
|
|
by icod
1454 days ago
|
|
|
k8s IS complex, not because it's new, which it isn't anymore, but it's so complex that even the developers have lost oversight. And not just that, it's expensive. It requires a lot of hardware just for the base, 9 servers minimum. The more complex something gets the harder it is to get done right. I would downvote you if I could because what you wrote is just ignorant and anyone who dealt with k8s before can tell that you never dealt with it. |
|
|
I don't know why you're snarking so hard when there are dozens of managed Kubernetes offerings out there.
> It requires a lot of hardware just for the base, 9 servers minimum.
An HA deployment requires 3 nodes for the control plane, and as many or few workers as necessary. But yes, this is 3 more nodes than you would run without automated orchestration. Of course, the cost of these 3 nodes is amortized over all of the worker nodes, so if you're only running 3 worker nodes you're paying 100% for orchestration, but if you're running 30 worker nodes you're only paying 10% (this is assuming equally sized nodes, for simplicity).
> The more complex something gets the harder it is to get done right.
Right, but if someone else packages that complexity up for you in a piece of software (like Kubernetes or Linux) it's often much easier to get it done right than it would be to roll your own from primitives.