|
|
|
|
|
|
by LeFantome
1467 days ago
|
|
|
What is GNU and what is not these days? Is Wayland? Is GNOME? Have you checked out Chimera Linux? Should I refer to that system as “the Linux kernel” or “GNU/Linux”? Neither makes sense. Personally, I find it the most sane to understand that “Linux” is the name of the kernel and a “Linux Distribution” is a curated collection of software that runs on the Linux kernel. GNU Software may or may not be involved. For me, the whole “GNU/Linux” things has always felt desperate. It is a bit like the 70’s BSD guys says AT&T needed to call their software BSD/UNIX because so many people used BSD stuff on their systems. |
|
|
There is a definitive list: https://www.gnu.org/software/
> Is Wayland? Is GNOME?
Wayland never was. GNOME was at one point but isn’t any longer.
> Have you checked out Chimera Linux? Should I refer to that system as “the Linux kernel” or “GNU/Linux”? Neither makes sense.
Neither, but it would be both accurate and more specific to say that it is a Linux-based OS with BSD’s userland.
> whole “GNU/Linux” things has always felt desperate.
It’s now “desperate” to ask to receive credit for software you wrote? GNU wrote coreutils and gcc and early GNOME and those are part of pretty much any early GNU/Linux system and you think giving GNU credit for the work they put into building an OS is ‘desperate’?? No offense but screw that.
> It is a bit like the 70’s BSD guys says AT&T needed to call their software BSD/UNIX because so many people used BSD stuff on their systems.
But the BSD guys never said that..that I can tell. Unless you can provide specific examples, I can only assume this is a straw man and ignore it.