[lettergram]

As someone who did just that (went remote, moved to a small town with a Bay Area salary). I can say it’s amazing and highly recommend.

That said, no one else I know chose it. You lose a lot of the city night life and niche things. Instead you gain space, more rural style hobbies, less diverse food (particularly if you eat out), etc.

A lot of people aren’t able to recognize the pros / cons of such a trade.

For anyone reading, I recommend living in a suburban / rural location. Get out and take care of a big garden, go to local events and join a few clubs. Definitely a positive experience.

[filoleg]

How long ago did you make that switch? Asking because with things like that, there is always an amazing honeymoon period, but reality settles in a few years down the road.

Not just talking about the urban=>rural switch specifically, but in the opposite direction as well, and when it comes to pretty much any major change of a similar nature in general.

[ghaff]

I live about an hour outside a major Northeast city in an ex-urban/semi-rural location. (It's not really rural but I'm one of three houses on about 100+ acres of land and can't really see my neighbors at this time of year.)

I find it's a decent compromise. I have space. I can take walks in the woods or easily drive to small mountain hikes. But I'm only about an hour to go in for live theater, a meal, etc. And there's nothing keeping me from going into town for a weekend if I wanted to.

[pengaru]

> less diverse food (particularly if you eat out)

After spending a few years in a very rural part of CA while rebuilding my cabin, the lack of quality diverse organic produce I'd taken for granted in SF Bay area grocers is one of the biggest complaints I have.

I haven't seen a Pomelo in a store for over 4 years now, let alone an organic one.

[quantumwannabe]

You can buy exotic produce online these days, so you can mitigate that if you know what you want.