|
|
|
|
|
by btilly
1467 days ago
|
|
You are attempting a reductio ad absurdum by saying that since the potential consequences of the rule you outline leads to a result that you don't like, said rule cannot actually exist. This is backwards. There are lots of rules out there which I'm sure you dislike. Therefore your dislike of this one is irrelevant. And I say that despite agreeing with you about how it might be abused. And despite wondering whether the people calling for more diversity and exclusion in this letter may be the kind of people to abuse it that way. Rules are rules, and we should try to apply them fairly, especially when applied to people we dislike. |
|