|
|
|
|
|
|
by loup-vaillant
1468 days ago
|
|
|
I'm sorry, C++?!? Granted, C is underpowered and I would like namespaces and generics. But from a safety standpoint nowadays, C++ is just as bad. Not only is is monstrously complex, it still has all the pitfalls of C. C++ may have been "more strongly typed" back in the day, but now compiler warnings made up for that small difference. Granted, C++ can be noticeably safer if you go RAII pointer fest, but then you're essentially programming in Java with better code generation and a worse garbage collector. --- There's also a reason to still write C today: its ubiquity. Makes it easier to deploy everywhere and to talk to other languages. It's mostly a library thing though, and the price in testing effort and bugs is steep. |
|
|
C++ had a defined multithreaded memory model and 2's compliment behavior before C did. Since you're all about UB, that kinda matters. A lot.