[newbie2020]

You have to be careful with the line of reasoning that just because these certain managers and team members are part of a cult that is known to engage in bad acts, doesn’t mean you can cast the group’s shortcomings upon the individuals (without proof). If that were the case, I can point out a few mainstream religions that condone reprehensible practices, many of whose members you probably work with daily

[ineedasername]

You can certainly stop them paying themselves hundreds of thousands of dollars by giving themselves contracts as wine vendors.

[rendall]

It turns out the wine is from a nearby vineyard not at Orange House. The connection is that the person running this vineyard is a former member who used to run the Orange House vineyard before he left.

[GauntletWizard]

The allegation that the person is a "Former Member" is a valid point to contest. Announcing leaving the cult after a scandal is a good sign, moving to a new winery nearby is pretty neutral, still receiving hundreds of thousands in orders from the cult members is a bad sign. On the balance, probably not enough to convict in a court of law, more than enough for Google to take their own investigation before deciding if they see it as self-dealing.

[whoopdeepoo]

At what point can you hold people accountable for the actions of the groups they voluntarily associate with?

[ineedasername]

When they're part of those actions, like giving themselves a contract for the wine they make.