|
|
|
|
|
by jseutter
1463 days ago
|
|
Getting Ecstasy to market involves fewer regulatory hurdles than even drugs for animals. It just so happens to be illegal in most countries. I thought he'd be doing "this drug is for cats" wink wink and then people use it, but in retrospect a judge would see right through that. I wonder if it would be significantly cheaper to go through regulatory approvals for a drug in another country, to the point where it would be worthwhile to relocate the company? |
|