|
|
|
|
|
|
by ljp_206
1463 days ago
|
|
|
As soon as you suggested that such an embedded PNG may only work on an older client, a lightbulb went off for me. Most spam is predicated on attacking those too technologically literate to vet the attack. A smart scammer could create an email that would go under the radar of more modern client users, who are likely to report the message as spam and reduce the scammer's reach. If the message only works in older clients used by softer targets, then their chances of success are increased. If this is the intended method of the attack, it's quite clever. Imagine if you could still blanket spam every email you come across, but only target users with old, outdated clients, who are likely older, less technologically savvy, etc... It would be well worth the R&D time. Such reasoning follows the theory that spam messages include many typos in order to weed out 'smart' users, who are not desirable targets anyway. |
|
|
Q: Is reporting spam (and if so, to whom?) actually of benefit? If so, how?
If you "report" spam at Gmail or in Office 365, what actually happens?
Does some magic kick in and move - in real time - all identical (similar?) messages out of Inboxes and into Spam folders across the globe? Or is it more about training filters for the next wave?