Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bcrosby95 1464 days ago
Sure. But you can't ask California to solve "its" water problem while solving everyone's food problem. One of them has to give.
2 comments

We can solve the food problem with not efficient crops than pistachios and almonds and nobody had to eat beef either. Of water was priced at market price crops would be chosen where that strike the right balance between hope much people value the particular food vs what else we could do with the water. All that is a pipedream though, since farmers have wells and stuff instead of getting it from the faucet like I do.
Water should be priced the same for everyone, there's no reason that alfalfa farmers should pay a hundredth of a percent that I do for the same resource.
Nations will never stop agricultural subsidies due to national food security and rural district votes. It’s not just price supports and crop insurance but dams to deliver water and electricity.

Tap water is drinkable and plumbed into your home. That’s why it costs more than canal water that’s neither.

Almonds are not needed for national food security.
Neither is beef or cotton. Hence I alluded to rural district votes.