|
|
|
|
|
by pyrtsa
5340 days ago
|
|
I don't think introducing more syntax to the language for a feature that ultimately is a library solution, is a sustainable way to go. But if you really need a compact notation for smart pointers, you'll get pretty close by using template aliases, e.g. template <typename T> using up = std::unique_ptr<T>;
template <typename T> using sp = std::shared_ptr<T>;
// ...
up<int> foo(sp<int> bar) {
return bar ? up<int>(new int(*bar)) : nullptr;
}
|
|