[jdasdf]

>It is opposed to a mutually beneficial relationship, where both parties profit approximately the same.

That's not what a mutually beneficial relationship is.

>Some people also consider most employment contracts as exploitative (wage slavery), as the owners of a company extract more money than the workers get in compensation (profit is essentially exactly the difference between what the workers and capital owners were payed and what the vue of their work was - and it is entirely the property of the owners, not the workers). Whether you believe the difference between the value you bring to the company and the wages you are paid is large or small will more or less determine whether you think the company is exploiting you or you are in a mutually beneficial relationship with it - and neither option is objectively right or wrong.

And now I see that you're simply spewing socialist ideology with no grounding in reality.