[eszaq]

With more housing, the relative expense decreases, and some people will move in just because they like the bustle of living in a city. Those are also the kind of people who will patronize local establishments.

Years ago, the center of the action in "Silicon Valley" was actually in the geographical valley, in the south bay. The south bay is way different from SF - safe and sterile. Some people would move up to SF and commute all the way down to the south bay just because they wanted to live somewhere interesting. Those sort of people also tended to be the sort to start startups, and the center of the action gradually moved to SF.

I think SF can try following the same path a second time, focus on catering to the gritty hipster demographic and hope something valuable grows out of it. Added housing to push rents lower seems like a good start.

[inamberclad]

I think it's more that the barriers to entry for tech businesses have plummeted. In the olden days (80's, 90's, etc), you didn't have the internet as your force multiplier.

[mc32]

I can see professionals making this calculus, but not the service sector workers proponents often want to see move into cities.

[epicureanideal]

> and the center of the action gradually moved to SF

Is this true? Are there some numbers available for comparison?