[_57jb]

I love this.

I think to expect perfection in timing and aligning work done by humans, even where someone could make reasonable foresight arguments, is overlooking how challenging this wide level of supporting an ecosystem is.

The response they made is in regards to security and making ut clear to users that they are expected to be anti-fragile to change. Even if the roadmap itself changes.

I've changed decisions, even flip-flopped several times due to uncertainty. When at the heart of the message they are acting with positive intent, I applaud their short, sweet, and to the point message along with their reasoning.

I worked with an organization that allowed TLS 1.1 for far too long because customers systems hadn't been updated. If they paid enough money, we had to allow it. Meanwhile we were getting beat up by the competition because, "Why would any good development company allow this?!?"

[Something1234]

How does that work in their marketing? We are more secure cause we only use the latest protocol and deprecate things before our customers are ready?

[_57jb]

Equifax would like to have a word with you.