|
|
|
|
|
|
by sokoloff
1464 days ago
|
|
|
> The real problem here is that scientific works are not artistic creations and shouldn't be covered by copyright While they are perhaps not artistic creations, I see scientific papers as the creative work of one or more humans. Most computer code is not an artistic creation, but is a creative work nonetheless. My comment here is not artistic… |
|
|
Not in general artitistic though. Shoe-horning [ie forcing] computer code into the frame of copyright is also a bad move. It needs its own IPR really.