|
|
|
|
|
by niconii
1465 days ago
|
|
I don't understand what you mean. Please elaborate. That quote says that </p> is not needed in many cases. When you say "none of those clauses apply to <p>", this is true, you can't omit <p>, only </p>... but the blog article doesn't advocate for omitting <p> at any point. |
|
2. The spec details situations where the </p> tag may be omitted.
3. None of these (2) apply to what's going on at (1).