Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tornato7 1471 days ago
All which can be learned through focus groups and internal feedback, no need to further confuse and frustrate your users.
2 comments

After you have the engine running, the marginal cost of an A/B is probably smaller than a focus group test. So if you really believe in focus groups for the results and you are also ambitious enough - probably this means go for A/B.

Disclaimer: just thinking, not knowing the costs

Definitely agree, though I think the point of this thread is we don’t know the “true cost” of A/B testing in terms of long-term lost user engagement.

Have we done an A/B test for A/B testing where we test A/B testing…

It’s very common to think something is a good idea based on focus groups and internal feedback and then learn it’s a bad idea from launching it (or running an AB test).