|
|
|
|
|
by stared
1477 days ago
|
|
There is always balance with reinventing the wheel. Plus, a custom library often gives way more technical debt than a standard one. Less battle-tested, fewer tutorials, very often a lot of idiosyncrasies. A few times, we were going a different route: We use libraries if needed, but after some time, we pruned ones from which we used only a few functions/classes. That way, there is (almost) no delay in development, but there is this process to keep things clean. The converse is much more challenging. Writing a lot of code then discovering one is effectively reimplementing an existing library, which took quite a few person-years. |
|