|
|
|
|
|
by trashtester
1474 days ago
|
|
Solar is great in deserts, where the sun always shines and were the main use of electricity is air conditioning during the hottest parts of the day. Solar is near-useless in colder areas, where you want to use the power for heating in the winter. If you include the storage + grid expansion needed to compensate for the intermittent nature of most renewables (especially if you don't want to rely on fossil fuels when the wind is not blowing), the LCOE of many of them will be many times higher than just the production cost. Meanwhile, Korea claims to be able to construct Nuclear capacity at prices down to $0.03/kwh with their APR1400 reactors: https://www.kns.org/files/pre_paper/34/15A-435%EC%9D%B4%EA%B... That's at least an order of magnitude lower than the cost of renewables when constant output is required. |
|