Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by targafarian 1475 days ago
My understanding is that accelerated reliability / lifetime testing is often not terribly representative of actual performance (sometimes failures are underestimated, sometimes overestimated; in either case, the mechanisms for failure can simply be different from those that are emphasized during the testing).
1 comments

It is representative if you do it correctly. But testing is expensive. And the development time is short. Etc.