It happens now and has happened in recent times among all types of employers. The historical and union specific example wasn't necessary.
Companies can strongly suggest who employees should vote for and solicit donations to specific candidates.
As far as checking a record of actual votes, that's old days Tammany Hall kind of stuff. Not to say it wouldn't happen again if people could easily get away with it.
FWIW, the union example may be relevant because it's actually the origin of the anti-voter-interference laws in most states. Pennsylvania specifically is rooted in precisely the scenario up-thread described due to the heavy-industry history of the state.
It is good that these laws continue to protect the voter's right to autonomy against new threats to it.
Searching "vot" brings up one hit on that page, about a union election. Searching "elect" has several hits, none of which have to do with fraud. What part of that Wikipedia page shows unions operating like that?
So "it's an accurate representation of how many unions acted, and to prove my point here's a biography of a criminal with union ties." I don't see how that's proving their point.
> So "it's an accurate representation of how many unions acted, and to prove my point here's a biography of a criminal with union ties." I don't see how that's proving their point.
Since you are asking me, If you read or scan the page you will see how unions historically operated in the US.
Companies can strongly suggest who employees should vote for and solicit donations to specific candidates.
As far as checking a record of actual votes, that's old days Tammany Hall kind of stuff. Not to say it wouldn't happen again if people could easily get away with it.
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/in-house/can-a-company-te...