Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sangel 1465 days ago
High risk compared to what? The alternative is absolutely no privacy (status quo) or no/limited functionality (not very useful). Seems like strictly better than having no privacy.
2 comments

Depending on your compliance needs and the sensitivity of your data, "limited functionality" may be a reasonable tradeoff, though.
Using fake encryption is much riskier than no encryption, because if you think you are safe you will do unsafe things with your data. If you know you are unsafe then you will take appropriate precautions.