[cudgy]

If it’s cheaper, why does it have to be a radical alternative? The healthcare system is so screwed up that simple solutions / “low hanging fruit” are available to be implemented. For example, allowing government prescription purchases to be negotiated, which a rational person would deem basic, but it is presented as a draconian act against insurance companies to allow it.

[bumby]

It doesn’t have to be radical to be useful. I think what Cuban is proposing is useful. It’s just not radically better than other options that already exist, so from that perspective calling it unique or novel or radical is mainly marketing hype.