Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lillecarl 1479 days ago
> That's the wrong measure; outlasting cables is inadequate.

Only if you don't realize the reason they're built that way is to not wear the connector down, they're designed to last "forever".

> In my experience, the "tongue" in the USB-C connector gets broken in about two years. That forces me to buy a new phone, and hope that it arrives before my old phone's battery dies.

I've never seen or heard anyone break the tounge of the USB-c.

> it's freaking consumer connector. It should just work

There are physical limitations to this and lightning are also prone to the issue.

> Meanwhile, I've never seen a lightning connector fail. The cords do, and they cost too much, but they're just cords.

All I see is broken iPhone cables, not that it matters though, since we're discussing connectors.

And, yes, the lightning connector could/should be more robust.

No.

https://media.idownloadblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/i...

See those teeny metal thingies in there? That's how an USB-c cable looks inside, why you ask? Because that's the most unreliable part of the connector (other than filling up with crap).

I mean if you're so incredibly violent you break the tounge then lightning would indeed be better, but that's not a common failure mode. It's designed for wear and tear, not violent bending forces.